by Sol Lightman
Think again. Cigarette companies will have you believing anything just
as long as you continue to buy their products. The fact is, although insoluble
tars are a
contributing factor to the lung cancer danger present in today's cigarettes,
the real danger is radioactivity. According to U.S. Surgeon General C.
Everette Koop (on
national television, 1990) radioactivity, not tar, accounts for at
least 90% of all smoking related lung cancer.
Tobacco crops grown in the United States are fertilized by law with
phosphates rich in radium 226. In addition, many soils have a natural radium
226 content.
Radium 226 breaks down into two long lived 'daughter' elements -- lead
210 and polonium 210. These radioactive particles become airborne, and
attach
themselves to the fine hairs on tobacco leaves.
Studies have shown that lead 210 and polonium 210 deposits accumulate
in the bodies of people exposed to cigarette smoke. Data collected in the
late 1970's
shows that smokers have three times as much of these elements in their
lower lungs as non smokers. Smokers also show a greater accumulation of
lead 210 and
polonium 210 in their skeletons,though no studies have been conducted
to link these deposits with bone cancer. Polonium 210 is the only component
of cigarette
smoke which has produced tumors by itself in inhalation experiments
with animals.
When a smoker inhales tobacco smoke, the lungs react by forming irritated
areas in the bronchi. All smoke produces this effect. However, although
these irritated
spots are referred to as 'pre-cancerous' lesions, they are a perfectly
natural defense system and usually go away with no adverse effects. Insoluble
tars in tobacco
smoke can slow this healing process by adhering to lesions and causing
additional irritation. In addition, tobacco smoke causes the bronchi to
constrict for long
periods of time, which obstructs the lung's ability to clear itself
of these residues.
Polonium 210 and lead 210 in tobacco smoke show a tendency to accumulate
at lesions in specific spots, called bifurcations, in the bronchi. When
smoking is
continued for an extended period of time, deposits of radioactivity
turn into radioactive 'hot spots' and remain at bifurcations for years.
Polonium 210 emits highly
localized alpha radiation which has been shown to cause cancer. Since
the polonium 210 has a half life of 21.5 years (Due to the presence of
lead 210), it can put an
ex-smoker at risk for years after he or she quits. Experiments measuring
the level of polonium 210 in victims of lung cancer found that the level
of 'hot spot' activity
was virtually the same in smokers and ex-smokers even though the ex-smokers
had quit five years prior to death.
Over half of the radioactive materials emitted by a burning cigarette
are released into the air, where they can be inhaled by non-smokers. In
addition to lead 210 and
polonium 210 it has been proven that tobacco smoke can cause airborne
radioactive particles to collect in the lungs of both smokers and non-smokers
exposed to
second hand smoke. Original studies conducted on uranium miners which
showed an increased risk of lung cancer due to exposure to radon in smokers
have been
re-run to evaluate the radioactive lung cancer risk from indoor air
radon. It turns out that tobacco smoke works as a kind of 'magnet' for
airborne radioactive
particles, causing them to deposit in your lungs instead of on furniture.
(Smoking indoors increases lung cancer risks greatly.)
It has been estimated that the total accumulated alpha radiation exposure
of a pack-a-day indoor smoker is 38 to 97 rad by age 60. (Two packs a day
yields up to
143 rad, and non-smokers receive no more than 17 rad.) An exposure
of 1 rad per year yields a 1% risk of lung cancer (at the lowest estimate.)
Don't smoke. Or if you do, smoke lightly, outdoors, and engage frequently
in activities which will clear your lungs. Imported India tobacco has less
than half the
radiation content ofthat grown in the U.S.
Nicotine, the active ingredient in tobacco smoke, has long been known
to be highly addictive. In fact, doctors and pharmacologists are not in
consensus as to which
is more addictive -- nicotine, or heroin.
Many people think smoking marijuana is just as harmful as smoking tobacco,
but this is not true. Those who hold that marijuana is equivalent to tobacco
are
misinformed. Due to the efforts of various federal agencies to discourage
use of marijuana in the 1970's the government, in a fit of "reefer madness,"
conducted
several biased studies designed to return results that would equate
marijuana smoking with tobacco smoking, or worse.
For example the Berkeley carcinogenic tar studies of the late 1970's
concluded that "marijuana is one-and-a-half times as carcinogenic as tobacco."
This finding was
based solely on the tar content of cannabis leaves compared to that
of tobacco, and did not take radioactivity into consideration. (Cannabis
tars do not contain
radioactive materials.) In addition, it was not considered that:
1.Most marijuana smokers smoke the bud, not the leaf, of
the plant. The bud contains only 33% as much tar as tobacco.
2.Marijuana smokers do not smoke anywhere near as much
as tobacco smokers, due to the psychoactive effects of cannabis.
3.Not one case of lung cancer has ever been successfully
linked to marijuana use.
4.Cannabis, unlike tobacco, does not cause any narrowing
of the small air passageways in the lungs.
In fact, marijuana has been shown to be an expectorant and actually
dilates the air channels it comes in contact with. This is why many asthma
sufferers look to
marijuana to provide relief. Doctors have postulated that marijuana
may, in this respect, be more effective than all of the prescription drugs
on the market.
Studies even show that due to marijuana's ability to clear the lungs
of smog, pollutants, and cigarette smoke, it may actually reduce your risk
of emphysema,
bronchitis, and lung cancer. Smokers of cannabis have been shown to
outlive non- smokers in some areas by up to two years. Medium to heavy
tobacco smokers
will live seven to ten years longer if they also smoke marijuana.
Sources:
(radioactivity)
E.A. Martel,
"Alpha Radiation Dose at Bronchial Bifurcations From Indoor Exposure to
Radon Progeny", Proceeds of the National Academy of
Science, Vol.
80, pp. 1285-1289, March 1983.
Naoimi H. Harley,
Beverly S. Cohen, and T.C. Tso, "Polonium 210: A Questionable Risk Factor
in Smoking Related Carcingenisis."
"Radiactivity:
the New-Found Danger in Cigarettes," Reader's Digest, March 1986.
"Would You Still
Rather Fight Than Switch?," Whole Life Times, Mid-April/May 1985.
(secret ingredients)
"What Goes Up
In Smoke?," Nation, December 23, 1991.
(marijuana)
"The Emperor
Wears No Clothes," Jack Herer, HEMP/Queen of Clubs Publishing, 1992